Natasha Akpoti replies Agbakoba, says only court can assess her case against Akpabio

“I place it on formal record that no such letters have ever
been served upon me by post, courier, or personal delivery,” she wrote.

“The imputation of recalcitrance is therefore inoperative.”

Akpoti-Uduaghan said she had maintained silence out of
respect for the doctrine of lis pendens — a legal principle that discourages
public commentary on matters before the courts.

She explained that two suits are currently pending: one
initiated by Akpabio’s wife at the FCT high court demanding N250 billion in
damages, and another filed by her at the federal high court in Abuja,
challenging her suspension from the senate.

“While Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 is unrelated to the
sexual harassment allegations I made against the President of the Senate, Suit
No. CV/816/2025 is directly related to the allegations of sexual harassment
instituted by your client’s spouse, on which issues have been joined,” she
said.

“It is improper for any party to make extrajudicial
comments.”

She also criticised Agbakoba for what she described as
double standard, noting that his client’s legal team had relied on the sub
judice rule to block a senate investigation, yet had now resorted to the media
to demand answers.

“A litigant may not approbate in the courts and reprobate in
the press,” she said.

On her six-month suspension from the senate, Akpoti-Uduaghan
accused Akpabio of presiding over his own case and denying her fair hearing, in
violation of natural justice principles.

“Nemo judex in causa sua: no one ought to be judge in his
own cause,” she wrote.

She also dismissed suggestions that her past interactions
with Akpabio amounted to contradictions in her complaint, saying civility
should not be mistaken for consent or comfort.

“To do so trivialises a serious concern of sexual
harassment, especially in a workplace using a dominant position,” she said.

“The nature of your demand for evidence in this manner, at
the instance of your client, simply indicates a broader misconception of what
truly amounts to sexual harassment as prescribed in several global protocols.”

Akpoti-Uduaghan maintained that Agbakoba had no legal
authority to demand that she substantiate her claims outside the court process.

“A private legal practitioner, however distinguished, is not
vested with adjudicatory authority under the Constitution or any statute of the
Federal Republic,” she said.

She further urged Agbakoba to advise his client on the
implications of presiding over proceedings in which he is personally involved.

“I respectfully invite you to provide your client with a
comprehensive advisory that addresses the entirety of the factual matrix,” she
wrote.

She restated that her complaint stands as filed.

“I stand by my complaint as lodged on 28th February 2025 and
as pleaded in my Defence and Counter-Claim in CV/816/25,” she said.

“This letter is issued solely to correct the public record
and to prevent a constructive admission being inferred from silence.”

She asked that any future correspondence be directed through
her lawyers.

On Sunday, Akpoti-Uduaghan issued a satirical apology letter
to Akpabio on her Facebook page.

In the letter, the senator expressed “deepest sarcasm and
utmost theatrical regret” for “the grievous crime of possessing dignity and
self-respect” in Akpabio’s presence.